Disputes – Claims, Authority to judge others, Remedy – Natural Law;

Every human is a private person.

• PRIVATE. Affecting or belonging to private individuals, as distinct from the public generally. Not official; not clothed with office. 
• PRIVATE PERSON. An individual who is not the incumbent of an office.
• PRIVACY, RIGHT OF. The right to be let alone, the right of a person to be free from unwarranted publicity.  The right of an individual (or corporation) to withhold
  himself and his property from public scrutiny, if he so chooses. It is said to exist only so
  far as its assertion is consistent with law or public policy, and in a proper case equity will interfere, if there is no remedy at law, to prevent an injury threatened by the invasion of, or infringement upon, this right from motives of curiosity, gain, or malice.
• PRIVATE LAW. As used in contradistinction to public law, the term means all that part of the law which is administered between citizen and citizen, or which is concerned with the definition, regulation, and enforcement of rights in cases where both the person in whom the right inheres and the person upon whom the obligation is incident are private individuals. See Public Law.
• Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition

1. The “Law of Conquest”, by any means, including but not limited to physical and mental coercion, is unlawful as it exceeds humans authority.
2. No human is perfect and we all make mistakes without ill intent based upon our knowledge and truth at that time.
3. As every human is equally the highest supreme sovereign, we can only judge ourselves and no other.
4. Every human has a lawful duty to any social group they are part of to ensure they have satisfied themselves that any harm caused by another was done with intent before seeking remedy.
5. This can only be done by establishing the truth. Truth is Sovereign

• Legal Maxim “To Lie is to go against the mind”
• Numbers Chap XXX verses 2 If a man vowe a vow unto the LORD, or sweare an oathe to bind his soule with a bond: he shall not breake his word, hee shall doe according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.
• From Gods Law YOUR WORD IS YOUR BOND!

6. To find the truth we must exhaust all reasonable means available to establish the facts so that we know harm caused was done with intent.

JURIS TANTUM. A presumption juris tantum is one which holds good in the absence of evidence to the contrary, but may be rebutted.  Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

7. This can only be done by laying a claim against the human who knowingly caused the harm.  A matter must be expressed to be resolved

Legal maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.”

8. The claim can only be based with what is true to us at that time by a witnessed statement.  Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit.

• Deuteronomie Chap XVII verse 6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death, be put to death: but at the mouth of one witnesse he shall not bee put to death.
• Deuteronomie Chap XIX verse 15 One witnesse shall not rise vp against a man for any iniquitie, or for any sinne, in any sinne that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be etablished.
• 5 Matthew Chap XVIII verse 16 But if he will not heare thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses euery word may be established.
• II Corinthians Chap XIII verse 1 This is the third time I am comming to you: in the mouth of two or three witnesses shal euery word be established.
• (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12)
• UK CPR  Part 6 – Service of Documents, Rule 6.14 Deemed service, Rule 6.29 Certificate of service,  Part 22 – Statements of Truth

9. We must allow the human who caused the harm sufficient time to show that their actions that caused you harm were without intent.
10. A claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point.

UK CPR Part 9 – Responding to Particulars of Claim – General, Part 16 – Statements of Case, Part 20 – Counterclaims and other Additional Claims

11. Last unrebutted truth stands as fact and becomes the default judgment.

• FACTO. In fact; by an act; by the act or fact. Ipso facto, by the act itself ; by the mere effect of a fact, without anything superadded, or any proceeding upon it to give it effect.
• FACT. A thing done; an action performed or an incident transpiring; an event or circumstance; an actual occurrence. An actual happening in time or space or an event mental or physical.
• PROOF. The effect of evidence; the establishment of a fact by evidence. Any fact or circumstance which leads the mind to the affirmative or negative of any proposition.. The conviction or persuasion of the mind of a judge or jury, by the exhibition of evidence, of the reality of a fact alleged.
• Legal maxims: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.”,
• “He who does not deny, admits.”
• (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15)
• UK CPR  Part 12 – Default Judgement

12. As no human has authority to take more than they need for survival from another, leave that as a minimum so as to not to force them into violence to survive, allowing them the opportunity to learn from their mistakes; and

THEREFORE 1, If matters cannot be settled privately call a court – Positive Law – Civil Jurisdiction;

• Equity looks to the intent, and will regard substance rather than form.
• JURIS ET DE JURE. Of law and of right. A presumption juris et de jure, or an irrebutable resumption, is one which the law will not suffer to be rebutted by any counter-evidence, but establishes as conclusive;.
• JURIS IGNORANTIA EST CUM JUS NOSTRUM IGNORAMUS. It is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights.
• QUI JURE SUO UTITUR, NEMINI FACIT INJURIAM.  He who uses his legal rights harms no
• one. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

1. If the matter cannot be settled privately between humans, the claimant must get a judgement from a public court, either by providing the documentation described herein for a summary judgement, or if contested from a jury made up of other members of the society to find a peaceful compromise.

UK CPR make and application for a summary judgement and  court order for implementation of the judgement Part 24 – Summary Judgment, Part 23 – General Rules about Applications for Court Orders,

THEREFORE 2, INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AS JUDGED BY A JURY;

1. All humans have a rights to an equitable process to have the facts established before any judgement of claims is made by any social group.

• Legal maxim: “If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.”.
• (Heb. 6:16-17.)

 THEREFORE 3, Laws exceeding the authority of its members are unlawful and do not require adherence unless consensually contracted into that sub-jurisdiction;

1. No human can be held liable under a jurisdiction they have not consented into.
2. No human can be held liable under a law of a jurisdiction they have consented into if it exceeds the authority of the consent.
3. Any human enforcing a law not consented to is acting unlawfully, and is personally liable for harm caused by their unlawful actions.

CANONS OF JUDICIAL ETHICS * With Amendments to January 1, 1968
Ancient Precedents.
“And I charged your judges at that time, saying Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. “Ye shall not respect persons in judgement; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgement is God’s; and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it”—
Deuteronomy, I, 16-17.
“Thou shalt not wrest judgement; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift; for a
gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.”—Deuteronomy, XVI, 19.

Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition

WHEREAS 4