WHEREAS 1: Absolute Law, Absolute Responsibility, Absolute Rights, Natural Law

The highest law is each living human under Absolute and Natural Law until someone can prove that they have more authority from the “creator” than another until rebutted (See The Limits of Individual Human Authority, Rights and Jurisdiction).
This limits each person’s authority is found to be twofold,
Fulfilling the needs of survival which is instinctive and unreasoned.
- (hereinafter ABSOLUTE LAW – the highest authority for all humans),
Being a member of society interacting with others, where our natural absolute rights are established by our authority, which is to not knowingly cause another creation harm.
- (hereinafter ABSOLUTE RESPONSIBILITY and ABSOLUTE HUMAN RIGHTS)
This is the foundation of the Civil Rules which has stood the test of time because it is discoverable to all and remains unrebutted, the test of unconscionable behaviour – intent to knowingly cause another harm (as proven with manslaughter vs. murder) and the doctrine of clean hands (Intent, acting unethically or has acted in bad faith)
- (hereinafter NATURAL LAW) .

WHEREAS 2: The Rules of Equity supercede “at Law”

EQUITABLE MAXIMS – PRINCIPALS OF CONSCIONABLE

Natural Law is reflected in the Laws as recorded in the group of books commonly referred to as The Holy Bible, as verified by Sir William Blackstone in his published Commentaries.

WHEREAS 3; POSITIVE LAW / Man Made Law / “at Law” – The Bible is the highest Law – Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction.

The King James 1611 Bible translation became the official text, being at least the 5th in a line of translations of many of the contents (Aramaic to Hebrew to Greek to Latin to English) and hence can only be considered as hearsay evidence, however again it largely follows Natural Law.
The reasoned facts not only follow the Bible and long established principals and the foundation of the Civil Rules as expressed in the Maxims prove the stability of Absolute Law taking precedence over Natural Law – a truth stands until rebutted.
The highest written positive law of the UK, is confirmed as the Bible upon which HM Queen Elizabeth II made her promises and signed the Oath.
This is further confirmed by the CANONS OF JUDICIAL ETHICS * With Amendments to January 1, 1968
Ancient Precedents.
“And I charged your judges at that time, saying Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. “Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God’s; and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I wil hear it”— Deuteronomy, I, 16-17.
“Thou shalt not wrest judgment; thou shalt not respect persons, neither take a gift; for a gift doth blind the eyes of the wise, and pervert the words of the righteous.”—Deuteronomy, XVI, 19.
These in Equity time precedence supersede the Magna Carta where a monopoly was set up to restrict the practice of law to the privileged for private profit of the realm, “We will not make any justiciaries, constables, sheriffs or bailiffs, but from those who understand the law of the realm and are well disposed to observe it.”—Magna Charta, XLV.
Extract of the oath taken by Elizabeth II in 1953 Transcript as supplied by Buckingham Palace; see also Edward Ratcliff, The Coronation Service of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, SPCK, 1953
- “……. Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?
- And the Queen answering,
- I am willing.
- The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and the Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:
- Archbishop. Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the …… according to their respective laws and customs?
- Queen. I solemnly promise so to do.
- Archbishop. Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?
- Queen. I Will. …….
- The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.
- Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath. …”
The Queens Oath confirms not that she has any more authority than the people she governs, but that she is accepting the responsibility which she accepted as inherited from the customs of generations past, and as long as the people accept this she is the highest authority in the instrument she uses “to govern the Peoples…”, which is the Parliament.

Therefore 1;

The Bible is the highest positive law jurisdiction in the UK.
There is no contractual relationship between the people and the monarchy,
The right to rule is no more than an unrebutted claim.

WHEREAS 4; Followed by Common Law Jurisdiction.

Alfred the Great codified the 3 prior Saxon codes to which he prefixed the 10 commandments of Moses and this established the Common Law from app 900 CE.
“Common Law” is the UK equivalent of “Roman Law”, both being the codification of customs and traditions of the time.
The actions of the procedures of Parliament, where senior figures including but not limited to MP’s take an oath or affirmation to faithfully serve HM Queen Elizabeth II with the help of a higher power (not always “so help me God”). For details link the is http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/swearingin/ for eg. MP’s oath
- “I (name of Member) swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.”

Therefore;

There is no contract resulting from voting due to the breach of contract by the MP’s who gave undertaking to the voters in exchange to represent them in the House of Commons based upon those undertakings. They now no longer are there to represent the people but have changed their allegiance to ” Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth, her heirs and successors, according to law. “.

WHEREAS 5: Statute Law is applicable to government employees and agents only – Criminal Jurisdiction

The Queen’s Speech delivered at State (hereinafter the name of the jurisdiction of the organisation she uses to govern the people) Opening, is the public statement of the government’s legislative programme for Parliament’s next working year.
- PUBLIC, adj. Pertaining to a state, nation, or whole community; proceeding from, relating to,
- or affecting the whole body of people or an entire community. Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.
- The state, nation or whole community being the people who help the sovereign to “govern the people…. according to their respective customs and laws”.
State Opening is the only regular occasion when the three constituent parts of Parliament that have to give their assent to new laws – the Sovereign, the House of Lords and the House of Commons – meet. The Speech is written by the government and read out in the House of Lords…. it sets out the government’s legislative agenda for the year. The final words, ‘Other measures will be laid before you’, give the government flexibility to introduce other bills (draft laws)…. State Opening takes place on the first day of a new session. The Queen’s Speech marks the formal start to the year. Neither House can conduct any business until after it has been read.
- (Parliament examines what the Government is doing, makes new laws, holds the power to set taxes and debates the issues of the day.)
- (The Prime Minister leads the government with the support of the Cabinet and ministers (who do not have to be a voted MP).
ACTs give their authority as follows
- “Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:”.
This is the limit of who has consented to fall under ACT’s and other legislative instruments of the “State”.
The Parliament according to their website where the Queens Speech states
- “.. the three constituent parts of Parliament that have to give their assent to new laws – the Sovereign, the House of Lords and the House of Commons…”,
yet on the Acts a fourth party appears, the Lords Spiritual!

Therefore:

There is no contractual relationship between non government employees or agents thereof and non contracting people.
Further the employees and agents of the government fall under that jurisdiction ONLY whilst on “government business” unless contracted otherwise.
Hence the ACTs only apply to contracting parties of the organisation the Queen uses “to govern the Peoples of…..”.
This fact is confirmed in the first promise as she “governs the Peoples of…… according to their respective laws and customs…” unless a person chooses under their freewill to work for the organisation the Queen uses to fulfil the promise which means public employees, agents, contractors etc. and only whilst they are on public business unless agreed otherwise, as that is the limit of jurisdiction and authority.
These separate “Civil” and “Criminal” jurisdictions are confirmed in the Senior Courts Act 1981, 49 Concurrent administration of law and equity.,
- (1)Subject to the provisions of this or any other Act, every court exercising jurisdiction in England or Wales in any civil cause or matter shall continue to administer law and equity on the basis that, wherever there is any conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law with reference to the same matter, the rules of equity shall prevail.

WHEREAS 6: Is there a possible relationship via “gods law”?

For this we need to go back to the Queens Speech
- Extract of the oath taken by Elizabeth II in 1953
- Transcript as supplied by Buckingham Palace; see also Edward Ratcliff, The Coronation Service of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, SPCK, 1953
- “…. Archbishop. Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?
- Queen. All this I promise to do….”
A baptism is the putting of a child into the jurisdiction of ecclesiastical law as the legal owner, the trustee, and the parent remains the beneficiary of their own child.
Once of lawful age the confirmation is done by the freewill of the people thereby submitting themselves lawfully to “gods law”.
Additionally the monarch is the head of the COE

Therefore:

Anyone confirmed falls under the jurisdiction of the COE.
The COE (Lords Spiritual) consent to all Acts.
And hence all Acts are consented to by the freewill of those who have been confirmed.

However:

There has not been a meeting of the minds (a belief that you are accepting to follow “gods law” only as opposed to Statute Law aswell) making this contract at all levels of Law invalid.

JURIS AFFECTUS IN EXECUTIONE CONSISTIT. The effect of the law consists in the execution.

WHEREAS 7; The hierarchy of Law in the UK

To ensure clarity is achieved hereafter in the misunderstanding between lawful and legal, and the precedence of Law from highest authority to lowest.;
1. ABSOLUTE LAW – the highest authority for all humans which establishes
2. ABSOLUTE RESPONSIBILITY and ABSOLUTE HUMAN RIGHTS.
3. NATURAL LAW – That which evolved from living in communities deduce able to all, reached through observation and deduction by reason. This is where the RULES OF EQUITY are applied, or at least should be if it was not under the control of the instrument used to govern societies. Additionally here is where the Police authority should be under which used to be the “Justice of the Peace”.
4. POSITIVE LAW (in UK) – This is the limit of “the state”.
  1. Bible – As the Sovereign is the highest authority entrusted to govern the people.
  2. Common Law ( in other countries eg. ROMAN LAW etc).
  3. International Law, Commercial Law etc.

Therefore: Definition of Legal

LEGAL – means company rules of the governing body the people have in place to govern their society known as Positive Law, STATUTE LAW, ACT’s, etc…
In personam actions all ways fall under the Rules of Equity where there is no immunity.

No one is above the Law
Equity will not let a statute cloak fraud.
Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.
MONOPOLY. A privilege or peculiar advantage vested in one or more persons or companies, consisting in the exclusive right (or power) to carry on a particular business or trade, manufacture a particular article, or control the sale of the whole supply of a particular commodity.