{"id":26,"date":"2018-04-14T09:20:43","date_gmt":"2018-04-14T09:20:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/publicnotices.community\/wordpress\/?page_id=26"},"modified":"2018-08-24T19:43:32","modified_gmt":"2018-08-24T19:43:32","slug":"1-the-limits-of-individual-human-authority-rights-and-jurisdiction","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/publicnotices.community\/wordpress\/sample-page\/1-the-limits-of-individual-human-authority-rights-and-jurisdiction\/","title":{"rendered":"A. Absolute Inalienable Human Rights And Authority"},"content":{"rendered":"

WHEREAS 1, All creations have equal authority;<\/span><\/h2>\n

AUTHORITY. Permission. Control over, jurisdiction. Often synonymous with power.\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/span>
\nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition. <\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. No human has evidence that could be judged, even by using a simple majority as the definition of proof, let alone beyond a shadow of doubt, that their socially conditioned belief system “creator” is the highest authority on planet earth from where they derive more rights than another creation.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    THEREFORE 1, The limit of humans individual authority;<\/span><\/h2>\n
      \n
    1. All creations have equal authority over other creations,<\/span><\/li>\n
    2. No human has authority to take beyond what they need for survival, which is shelter from the environment, clean water and nutritious food, which is unreasoned and instinct.<\/span><\/li>\n
    3. Each human is equally a highest supreme sovereign, and as equals when we interact with another human there can only be three self evident immutable truths,<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
        \n
      1. No human has authority to knowingly cause another creation harm beyond their needs for survival.<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n
      2. Each human has equal authority to the use and benefit derived from the transformation of other creations except another humans mental or physical labour.<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n
      3. Each human has equal authority to the use and benefit of information and knowledge left by generations past.<\/strong><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        JURE NATURE LEQUUM EST NEMINEM CUM ALTERIUS DETRIMENTO ET INJURIA FIERI LOCUPLETIOREM. By the law of nature it is not just that any one should be enriched by the detriment or injury of another.\u00a0<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nExodus 21:23-25; Lev.24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nLegal maxims:<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \n\u201cNo one is above the law.\u201d,\u00a0\u00a0 <\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \n\u201cCommerce, by the law of nations, ought to be\u00a0common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the\u00a0private gain of a few.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

        THEREFORE 2, Absolute Natural Inalienable Human Rights – Divine Right;<\/span><\/h2>\n

        INALIENABLE. Not subject to alienation; the characteristic of those things which cannot be bought or sold or transferred from one person to another,<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nRIGHT. As a noun, and taken in a concrete sense, a power, privilege, faculty, or demand, inherent in one person and incident upon another. “Rights” are defined generally as “powers of free action.”<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nAnd the primal rights pertaining to men are undoubtedly enjoyed by human beings purely as such, being grounded in personality, and existing antecedently to their recognition by positive law….<\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nJURE DIVINO. By divine right. <\/span><\/em><\/span>
        \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

          \n
        1. All humans have the right to take what they need for survival (including taking from any other living human who has more than they need) if other humans in a social system do not provide access to allow individuals to meet their own needs for survival.<\/span><\/li>\n
        2. Each human has the right to an equal share of benefit derived from global resources transformed except for another living humans labour and ideas.<\/span><\/li>\n
        3. Each human has the right to interact with another human until that human removes consent.<\/span><\/li>\n
        4. Each human has the right to use best available knowledge left from generations past.<\/span><\/li>\n
        5. Each human has the right of self defence to ensure their personal survival and the protection of their lawful property.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          WHEREAS 2, Lawful access to natural resources to meet human survival:<\/span><\/h2>\n
            \n
          1. All the requirements for human survival are only found on land.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            THEREFORE 1, ABSOLUTE LAW – Self evident laws for the needs of human Survival:<\/span><\/h2>\n

            A<\/span>BSOLUTE LAW. The true and proper law of nature, immutable in the abstract or in principle,<\/span><\/em><\/span>
            \nin theory, but not in application; for very often the object, the reason, situation, and other circumstances, may vary its exercise and obligation.1 Steph.Comm. 21 et seq. <\/span><\/em><\/span>
            \nJURIS IGNORANTIA EST CUM JUS NOSTRUM IGNORAMUS. It is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights. <\/span><\/em><\/span>
            \nQUI JURE SUO UTITUR, NEMINI FACIT INJURIAM.\u00a0 He who uses his legal rights harms no one.<\/span><\/em><\/span>
            \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Any human can lawfully live unhindered by others where they choose to meet their needs for survival.<\/span><\/li>\n
            2. Any human can take what they need for survival from those who have more than their need for their survival if they cannot have access to sufficient land to meet their needs of survival.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

              THEREFORE 2, NATURAL LAW\u00a0 -Self evident laws beyond the needs of human survival:<\/span><\/h2>\n

              NATURAL LAW. This expression, “natural law,” or jus naturale, was largely used in the philosophical speculations of the Roman jurists of the Antonine age, and was intended to denote a system of rules and principles for the guidance of human conduct which, independently of enacted law or of the systems peculiar to any one people, might be discovered by the rational intelligence of man, and would be found to grow out of and conform to his nature, meaning by that word his whole mental, moral, and physical constitution. <\/span><\/em><\/span>
              \nJURIS ET DE JURE. Of law and of right. A presumption juris et de jure, or an irrebutable presumption, is one which the law will not suffer to be rebutted by any counter-evidence, but establishes as conclusive;.<\/span><\/em><\/span>
              \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. No one can own natural resources, society can only agree who has usage rights.<\/span>
                \nGenesis 1:28\u00a0King James Version (KJV) And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.<\/span><\/em>Dominion.\u00a0Generally accepted definition of “dominion” is perfect control in right of ownership. The word implies both title and possession and appears to require\u00a0a complete retention of control over disposition. Eastex Aviation, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., C.A.Tex., 522 F.2d 1299, 1307<\/span><\/em>Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
              2. The value of goods and services can only result from human input (mental and physical), the benefit of which cannot be taken from any human against their freewill.
                \nLegal Maxim: \u201cIt is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property”<\/span><\/span><\/li>\n
              3. Witnessing without preventing another human causing harm knowingly without risking one’s own life is itself knowingly causing harm to the one being harmed.QUI NON IMPROBAT, APPROBAT. He who does not blame, approves. <\/span><\/em><\/span>
                \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


                \nWHEREAS 3, Lawful human interaction can only be by consent;<\/span><\/h2>\n

                JURIS PRIECEPTA SUNT HIEC: HONESTE VIVERE; ALTERUM NON LEDERE; SUUM CUIQUE TRIBUERE.\u00a0 These are the precepts of the law: To live honourably; to hurt nobody; to render to everyone his due.<\/span><\/em><\/span>
                \nBlack’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. \n
                    \n
                  1. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

                    Whenever one human imposes upon another human an interaction is started.<\/span><\/p>\n

                      \n
                    1. \n

                      <\/h2>\n

                      THEREFORE 1, By delegating authority an additional sub-jurisdiction below Jure Divino<\/em> is established for the interaction – Natural Jurisdiction.<\/span><\/h2>\n

                      <\/h2>\n

                      THERFORE 2, Delegation of authority to a new jurisdiction is limited to each individual’s authority – Natural Law<\/em>.<\/span><\/h2>\n

                      DELEGATION.<\/strong><\/em> A sending away; a putting into commission; the assignment of a debt to another; the intrusting another with a general power to act for the good of those who depute him; a body of delegates. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      AUTHORITY.<\/strong><\/em> Permission. Control over, jurisdiction. Often synonymous with power. The power delegated by a principal to his agent. The lawful delegation of power by one person to another. Power of agent to affect legal relations of principal by acts done in accordance with principal’s manifestations of consent to agent.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      JURISDICTION..<\/strong><\/em> It is the authority, capacity, power or right to act.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      QUI NON HABET, ILLE NON DAT.<\/strong><\/em> He who has not, gives not. He who has nothing to give, gives nothing. A person cannot convey a right that is not in him. If a man grant that which is not his, the grant is void.\u00a0 <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      JUS NATURALE<\/strong><\/em>. The natural law, or law of nature; law, or legal principles, supposed to be discoverable by the light of nature or abstract reasoning, in advance of organized governments or enacted laws.\u00a0 <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      <\/h1>\n

                      WHEREAS 4, Consent\u00a0 establishes a new sub-jurisdiction and limits its authority;<\/span><\/h2>\n

                      CONSENT.<\/strong><\/em> A concurrence of wills. Voluntarily yielding the will to the proposition of another;…. Consent is an act of reason, accompanied with deliberation, the mind weighing as in a balance the good or evil on each side…… It means voluntary agreement by a person in the possession and exercise of sufficient mentality to make an intelligent choice to do something proposed by another…<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                      Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                        \n
                      1. \n
                          \n
                        1. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n
                        2. Laws of any form of social community are limited to the individual authority of the humans forming the social community and must uphold the Absolute Inalienable Human Rights previously derived.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        3. To manage the interaction so as not to knowingly cause another harm, consent must be reached by affected humans establishing the jurisdiction where any positive law authorised by their delegation includes:<\/span><\/li>\n
                        4. What the interaction is,<\/span><\/li>\n
                        5. Ensuring all reasonable efforts have been used to include the best available knowledge,<\/span><\/li>\n
                        6. What is expected in exchange for allowing the proposed interaction,<\/span><\/li>\n
                        7. How the interaction can or will be ended.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        8. Full terms and conditions must be understood by all affected humans.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        9. Full terms and conditions must be agreed by all affected humans.<\/span><\/li>\n
                        10. JURIS POSITIVI<\/strong><\/em>. Of positive law; a regulation or requirement of positive law, as distinguished from natural or divine law. <\/em><\/span>\n

                          Lawful vs Legal:<\/em><\/strong> To avoid confusion definitions due to the lack of clarity and understanding of the difference of lawful as opposed to legal which are used interchangeably or to mean the same,\u00a0 the following definitions are given to avoid confusion.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          LAW.<\/strong><\/em> That which is laid down, ordained, or established. A rule or method according to which phenomena or actions co-exist or follow each other …… <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          The principal distinction between the terms “lawful” and “legal” is that the former contemplates the substance of law, the latter the form of law. …… <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          Further, the word “lawful” more clearly implies an ethical content than does “legal.” The latter goes no further than to denote compliance, with positive, technical, or formal rules; while the former usually imports a moral substance or ethical permissibility…..<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          A further distinction is that the word “legal” is used as the synonym of “constructive,” which “lawful” is not. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                          Lawfu<\/em><\/strong>l has the following 3 characteristics;<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

                            \n
                          1. \n
                              \n
                            1. \n
                                \n
                              1. Is discoverable by observation, and<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n
                              2. Is testable with reason, and<\/em><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n